Naomi Ackie

‘Mickey 17’ Movie and 4K Review

Posted on by The Ultimate Rabbit

The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.

Studio movies seem to be falling into two categories these days—they are either inspired by other movies or they are looking to do something unique and different. “Mickey 17” falls into the latter category. Even though it is based on the novel “Mickey7” by Edward Ashton, it is a rather unique and “out there” movie. It is a science fiction comedy with big ideas, over-the-top characters and representations. I can’t compare it to any other movie out there, which is becoming increasingly rare in today’s cinema. So often, when you watch a movie, it reminds you of one or two others that have already been released. Franchises, sequels and reboots are also becoming far too common. Original ideas, even if based off books, are infrequent visitors in the cinematic landscape of today.

“Mickey 17” is directed by the Academy Award-winning director of “Parasite,” Bong Joon Ho, and it follows the story of Mickey Barnes, played by Robert Pattinson of “Twilight” fame. After Mickey and his buddy Timo (Steven Yeun) fall into debt because their macaron business falls apart, they are out of options. This leads them to joining a spaceship crew where they hope to blend in and avoid getting murdered by flying under the radar. While Timo becomes a shuttle pilot, Mickey decides to become an “expendable,” which is a job where he is in charge of dying over and over again in order to find answers for various problems in society.

Mickey Barnes is sheepish, dopey, and painfully shy.  However, he enjoys his new lease on life because of his relationship with an agent named Nasha, played by Naomi Ackie. They are madly in love with each other, and she helps Mickey deal with the fact that dying is not a whole lot of fun. Even though he is brought back to life because of a process called “reprinting,” it doesn’t make dying any easier for Mickey as he is, in many ways, a human guinea pig. With his work, they are able to come up with vaccines that will save lives. 

One day, his life is turned upside down when his life is spared by a group of critters known as Creepers. This leads to him being turned into a double, so while he is Mickey 17, there is also a Mickey 18, a version of him that is confident, self-assured and fearless. Nasha doesn’t mind having two Mickey’s, as it is more fun for her to fool around with two versions of her boyfriend. On this expedition, there is a leader named Kenneth Marshall, played by Mark Ruffalo, and it’s hard not to draw comparisons to Donald Trump with his performance. I had to look this up after watching the movie, and I’m not the only one who felt this way, even though Bong Joon Ho and Ruffalo say that was not their intention. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. Kenneth’s wife is played by Toni Collette.

“Mickey 17” is a film high on ambition and ideas, but it doesn’t have a sense of direction, and its pacing is all over the map. One of the most frustrating aspects of this movie is the fact it has a lot to say and there is a lot going on, but it falls apart because there is no sense of where they want to go with all of this. Is it a love story? Is it a commentary on there being two versions of yourself? Is it a commentary on self-sacrifice? Is it about abuse of power? It’s all of those things and a whole lot more, but without a clear and concise vision, not all of these ideas have the time to be fleshed out, even though the film is two hours and seventeen minutes long. The film is wildly uneven and frustrating.

Another big issue with the film is Pattinson and his bland and uninteresting performance. He’s not a good actor, even when he is given good material. I understand he’s trying to be taken seriously as an actor, but he doesn’t have the chops to carry the comedic scenes, and he also struggles with the more serious material as well. This is another problem with the film—it’s in search of a tone. Since it’s trying to do so much at once, it doesn’t know how to balance its themes or tones. It’s also way too long, and it needed a good trip to the editing room.

* * out of * * * *

4K Info: “Mickey 17” is released on a single-disc 4K from Warner Brothers Home Entertainment. The film has a running time of 137 minutes and is rated R for violent content, language throughout, sexual content and drug material. It also comes with a digital copy that can be redeemed on most digital platforms.

4K Video/Audio: “Mickey 17” gets the Dolby Vision/Atmos treatment, and it’s a remarkable release.  The color palette really pops on this 4K release, and the Dolby Atmos audio track is also perfect for your home theater setup.

Special Features:

Behind the Lens: Bong Joon Ho’s Mickey 17 (11:32)

Mickey 17: A World Reimagined (9:44)

The Faces of Niflheim (8:00)

Should You Buy It?

“Mickey 17” is a film that might end up gaining a cult following in years to come, but it also might be a film that falls flat with a lot of audiences. I do think it is worth checking out because it is entertaining at times and has individual moments which stand out in a positive way. It’s just too inconsistent for its own good, and it needed better performances from its cast.  I absolutely hated the Mark Ruffalo character, but it probably wasn’t in the way they intended for me to hate the character. After spending a little bit of time with him, I wanted him off my TV, and I would audibly groan when he would reappear. The film does have some good special features and from an audio and visual aspect, it looks and sounds great. The movie is just a jumbled mess, but it’s rarely, if ever, boring. I’d recommend you watch this one first before you decide to add it to your collection.

**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free.  The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.

‘Blink Twice’ Movie and Blu-ray Review

Posted on by The Ultimate Rabbit

The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.

“Blink Twice” is a film with ambition, style, and some big goals.  It does not always achieve those goals from a filmmaking perspective, but it’s an interesting directorial debut from actress Zoë Kravitz, who also co-wrote the screenplay with E.T. Feigenbaum. The film also opens with a trigger warning for audiences, which is something I don’t think I’ve seen before from a big screen movie. I’ve seen it before on TV shows when a particular episode is going to show scenes involving abuse, suicide, or rape.  “Blink Twice” has become one of the most-talked about movies of 2024, and it’s easy to see why.  It’s a film that is either going to piss audiences off or leave them with a lot to ponder.

Our film opens up introducing us to Frida (Naomi Ackie) who, along with her friend and roommate Jess (Alia Shawkat), work a ritzy and glamorous exclusive event, where she runs into Slater King (Channing Tatum). He was recently forced to step down as CEO of his company after a scandalous event which forced him into therapy.  He claims to be a changed man and has also apologized publicly for his behavior.  When he runs into Frida and Jess, they are invited to his private island, where they have to put their phones in a bag.  It seems to be your typical rich, glamorous party with drugs and over-the-top behavior, but Slater insists he has toned down his behavior. The longer Frida and Jess spend at this private island, the more they suspect something is up. Can they put the pieces together?

Kravitz has assembled an all-star cast for her feature film debut.  The film features unique screen performances from Christian Slater, Haley Joel Osment, Geena Davis, Kyle MacLachlan, and Simon Rex.  While their performances are unique and out there, unfortunately these are not characters that are particularly well-written or fleshed out. Since they are good actors, they chew up the scenery.  However, I can only imagine how much more effective these performances would have been if these characters were not so one-dimensional. The stand-out performance comes from Tatum, who gives a chilling, eerie and unnerving performance.

The first 45-60 minutes are repetitive and boring at times, even though the film is shot beautifully and looks fantastic.  As a director, Kravitz has a keen eye behind the camera. This is a gorgeous film featuring beautiful people looking their best while doing very bad things.  The film is much more interesting in the third act when certain elements of the plot are revealed to the audience.  I wanted the film to be more like the third act, which was lively, intense and exciting. The film lost me for the first hour or so, which is why it was too little, too late to save it as a whole.

I could examine all of the issues and themes which are rather on-the-nose, but I don’t think it would serve my review.  I think Kravitz has A LOT to say, and she’s not shy about how she goes about presenting that message. Is it preachy at times? Yes, but it didn’t take me out of the film or make me lose interest in the story. As a matter of fact, it did the opposite for me—it left me with a lot to think about long after the credits rolled.  It made me want to see what she has up her sleeve in the future as a filmmaker.  “Blink Twice” is a film that gains traction the more you think about it and the further removed you are from it as an audience member. It was the lack of action and the pacing which took me out of the film in the first hour.

Overall, “Blink Twice” almost lost me entirely for a good chunk of its running time.  This is something that cannot be ignored.  If I wasn’t reviewing the movie, I would have shut it off.  Yes, I enjoyed the scenery and the acting, but the plot took way too long to get moving.  That being said, I also can’t ignore the power and the impact of the film’s final act along with the energy Kravitz brought to this film as a director. After the movie was over, it stayed with me and I thought about it for a long time.  This is a movie that is below average for the first 45-60 minutes before it ends with a bang for the final 30-35 minutes. This is a brainy film. I give it a slight recommendation with some hesitation.

* * out of * * * *

Blu-ray Info: “Blink Twice” is released on a single-disc Blu-ray from Warner Brothers Home Entertainment. The film has a running time of 102 minutes and is rated R for strong violent content, sexual assault, drug use and language throughout, and some sexual references. It comes with a digital copy of the film as well.

Blu-ray Audio/Video Info: “Blink Twice” looks good on Blu-ray, but I’m not sure why this film didn’t get a 4K release.  This film was screaming to be released on 4K, and I’m not sure why they didn’t offer that option. It is still a solid Blu-ray, but a 4K transfer would have been eye-popping and mesmerizing.  The Dolby Audio is also solid, but an Atmos track would have been preferred for this movie. Subtitles are included in Parisian French, Castilian Spanish, Italian, English, Latin Spanish, and Canadian French.

Special Features:

NONE

Should You Buy It?

Considering this film should have received a 4K release and there are no special features on this Blu-Ray disc, I don’t think it is a film you need to purchase right away. It also doesn’t come with a slipcover for the Blu-ray. For a collector like me, I enjoy a slipcover over the Blu-ray case. For the time being, it is a film worth seeing, despite how frustrating it can be at times.  I’d recommend you rent the film from a digital platform like Amazon, YouTube or Apple TV. It’s worth renting digitally and checking out.  I’m looking forward to the next film from director Zoë Kravitz, as she impressed me with her first offering.

**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free.  The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.