‘Buddy’ Once Again Proves Parents Do Not Take the Time to Research a Movie Before Letting Their Kids Watch One

Oh great, here we go again. I thought and hoped people would have learned their lesson after a teacher made the unforgivable mistake of letting a class of fourth graders watch “Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey” without researching it to see that it was a full-blown horror film which Walt Disney would never have approved of.

This past weekend saw the release of “Buddy” which marks the feature film directorial debut of Caspar Kelly. On the surface, it looked like an innocent motion picture with a main character who seemed reminiscent of Barney the purple dinosaur or other children shows from the 1990’s. But upon closer inspection, particularly after reading through the movie’s description on its Wikipedia page, it is actually a “supernatural comedy horror film” in which a group of children find themselves trapped inside a television program designed for their age group, and they spend the length of it trying to escape the murderous clutches of the show’s seemingly lovable host.

Reports came out over the weekend that parents took their kids to see “Buddy,” thinking it would be the perfect cinematic outing for the whole family. These kids ended up coming out of it traumatized, and their parents have been demanding refunds in the aftermath. Many of these parents have blamed the theaters and their employees for not warning them of the film’s content. Those who work at these same theaters say it is not their fault, and they are absolutely correct.

For the record, I have not seen “Buddy” as of yet, but I did take the time to research what it was about in ways those parents never bothered to. For those who actually took the time to do the same, we can all agree that this movie, which currently has a certified fresh score of 88% on Rotten Tomatoes, is most definitely not for kids.

Seriously, look at this poster below for a second:

On one hand, it features a lovable looking bright orange unicorn, but something seems off as the image looks fuzzy as if the television showing this program has bad reception. This should be your first indication that something is off about this particular character as images can be deceiving. And, as Bo Diddley one said, you can’t judge a book by looking at its cover.

Now let us take a look at what is billed as the movie’s final trailer:

As this trailer begins, it does make “Buddy” look like an innocent family flick as it invites kids to “face their fears” among other things. But the closer you look at the images presented here, you see that the kids surrounding that bright orange unicorn look scared as hell and are looking to escape that creature’s clutches. Plus, you have that image of mother screaming her lungs out, and that has got to be of a parent experiencing their worst nightmare.

But perhaps the most definitive mark in this trailer for “Buddy” comes at the very end when the narrator announces that this film has been rated R for “graphic violence and gore.” And in taking a closer look at the MPA rating, it states the rating is for “sequences of strong bloody horror, violence and gore, language and weaponry.”

Or perhaps you need to look at these movie trailers to realize that your children might not come out of this motion picture in one piece:

Seriously, do I need to say much more after you have watched this?

Still not convinced? Then perhaps the most persuasive piece of evidence can be found on the Common Sense Media website which has a Parents’ Guide to “Buddy.” They have left the following sentence for all to see:

“Bloody horror tale looks like kids’ TV but definitely isn’t.”

And then there is the “Parents Need to Know” section which states the following:

“Parents need to know that Buddy is a dark horror comedy that’s reminiscent of a 1990s-era children’s TV show, featuring a costumed character of an orange unicorn (voiced by Keegan-Michael Key) that exhibits sinister tendencies. Violence includes children in peril and being roughly handled (as well as harmed off-screen), death, blood and gore, stabbing, impaling, a strangling, punching, head bashing and cleaving, intense violence involving costumed characters (head ripped off, gruesome burns, slicing bloody slabs off their own body, and more), a jump scare, a monster, and much more. Language isn’t frequent but includes “f–k,” “s–t,” “t–ty,” “bitch,” “hell,” “penis,” “poop,” etc.”

Seriously mom and dad, isn’t this enough to convince you that your children are better off watching “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” for the seventh time instead of taking them to see “Buddy?”

When all is said and done, I have absolutely no sympathy for the parents who took their children to see “Buddy” without knowing what it was about. No, I am not a parent, but even I would check a cinematic endeavor ever so thoroughly before sending any youngling I know into a darkened movie theater. You may yell at me saying how I don’t know what it is like to guide children through nightmares and psychological trauma, but isn’t that your job as a parent? Feel free to tell me what you think about this in the comments.

Granted, no one is perfect. My father let my brother rent “Uncommon Valor” from Nino’s TV and Video in Thousand Oaks, California years ago, but he did not know this film was rated R. I told my dad that it was rated R, but this was mainly because I was pissed my brother got to watch such movies with this rating like “Caddyshack” and “Risky Business” while I was denied such privileges. My brother was super pissed at me for pointing “Uncommon Valor’s” rating out as he was forced to take the VHS copy of the movie back to the video store, cursing me all the way over there. Well, at least one person was watching out for others!

While I am at it, are there not images of “Buddy’s” bright orange unicorn with his, or their, face half burned off? Doesn’t this tell you something. Like Chucky from the “Child’s Play” movies, this one takes a lick and keeps on ticking. Seriously, think about it!

‘Companion’ Movie and 4K Review

The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.

Hollywood is famous for reflecting what is happening in our world, especially when it comes to current events.  Everywhere we turn these days, we hear about artificial intelligence.  As someone who owns Apple products, I can have my emails and text messages summarized and changed in order to sound friendly, professional, or concise. My incoming emails can also be summarized for me. While I think certain aspects of artificial intelligence can be useful or interesting, it is like most things in life: too much of a good thing can quickly turn into a bad thing.  “Companion,” directed by Drew Hancock, is the latest artificial intelligence film from Hollywood.

“Companion” opens up by introducing us to Iris (Sophie Thatcher) and Josh (Jack Quaid) who have a meet-cute in a grocery store where he knocks over oranges.  At first, they seem like your normal, everyday couple who meet, hit it off, and fall in love.  Iris informs the audience of two pivotal moments in her life: the day she met Josh and the day she killed him. Iris and Josh meet up with Josh’s friends, Patrick (Lukas Gage), Eli (Harvey Guillén), Kat (Megan Suri), and Sergey (Rupert Friend). Sergey has a beautiful home with an even better view, so they look forward to a weekend of friendship, booze, and good times.  However, it doesn’t take long for things to take a turn for the worse when Iris ends up killing Sergey.

After this unfolds, all hell breaks loose for the remaining five characters. Speaking of the characters, they are unlikable and one-note. “Companion” was a low-budget film, as it was made for $10 million and takes place in essentially one setting.  However, a low budget film isn’t an excuse for lazy writing or poor character development.  These are not interesting people to spend time with, unfortunately. Josh is an insecure manchild who plays the victim card. Kat is an ice queen. Eli and Patrick are a one-note gay couple. Sergey is just a boring pervert. There isn’t a lot of meat on the bones with these characters.

The film doesn’t offer a lot of new insights or opinions on the issue of artificial intelligence, control, or how we view and treat each other or robots. It is clear Josh is abusing his relationship with his robot Iris, but we have seen films in the past where the robots look for revenge on their human counterparts because the humans treat them in an inhumane fashion. The discussion about abuse of power has been done to death in films, and this film falls flat after a promising start. Maybe I’ve become jaded to these films, but what else can really be said about the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence?

When I think of a great film on the subject of artificial intelligence, I think of 2014’s “Ex Machina.” I also think of the 2019 remake of “Child’s Play” and 2022’s “M3GAN.” The groundwork has been laid for these films in the past, and I know we have seen robots and humans in the “Terminator” franchise. I could go back even further, but you get the picture. “Companion” feels like a gimmick, and when a movie is a gimmick without a proper story or well-written characters, it feels like we have been there, done that. Plus, the market is so oversaturated with these films at the moment.  If you can count on Hollywood for anything, it is to take a popular idea and run it into the ground.  I think they need to let this genre breathe for a while and return with a new take on the genre.

Even though I’m aware this review sounds incredibly negative, there are certain aspects of the film I did like. I thought it was beautifully shot and had a tremendous soundtrack filled with banger after banger. The performance from Sophie Thatcher was fantastic, as she appears very fragile and vulnerable but also bad-ass and tough. It runs a brisk 97 minutes and is not bad to watch, but it doesn’t break any new ground.  It’s an average movie that is inoffensive and forgettable but well made. You won’t hate yourself for having watched it, but you won’t remember much about it after it’s over.

* * out of * * * *

4K Info: “Companion” is released on a single 4K disc from Warner Brothers Home Entertainment.  It has a running time of 97 minutes and is rated R for strong violence, sexual content, and language throughout. There is a digital copy of the film included inside the 4K packaging.

4K Video Info: On 4K HDR, the film lends itself perfectly to the format with a striking and vibrant transfer.  A 2025 film like “Companion” stands out on 4K, as the picture quality is stunning.

4K Audio Info:  The Dolby Atmos track was top-notch throughout the course of the film, as I only had to adjust the volume twice when it was a little top heavy during a party scene. Subtitles are included in English, Spanish, and French.

Special Features:

I Feel, Therefore I Am

Love, Eli

AI Horror

Should You Buy It?

“Companion” is a film that doesn’t reinvent the wheel when it comes to the subject of artificial intelligence in cinema, and it left me feeling underwhelmed and disappointed. When a film is low-budget, it needs to be high on ideas, but this one doesn’t have anything new to say about this subject matter.  The cast is full of likable actors, but their characters are one-dimensional and bland.  The kills are run-of-the-mill and ordinary.  There was clearly a lot of skill behind the camera, but this film needed a sharper screenplay to really set itself apart and allow it to stand out. The 4K with a slipcover offers a remarkable visual and audio experience, so if you did enjoy “Companion,” you will be happy with the presentation. You will also be pleased with the special features included here. For everyone else, I think you need to rent or stream the film first before you decide to add it to your collection. While the film has a high score on Rotten Tomatoes, it didn’t work for me.

**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free.  The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.

‘The Wrath of Becky’ Fearlessly Outdoes the Original

The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.

I vaguely remember watching 2020’s “Becky” when it was released through various digital platforms.  Besides the brutal violence and seeing Kevin James as a Neo-Nazi, the film didn’t really leave a lasting impression on me as a viewer. When I heard they were going to make a sequel, “The Wrath of Becky,” I was intrigued for two reasons: Lulu Wilson and Seann William Scott.  Wilson is a tremendous young actress who shows maturity beyond her years, and Scott has shown a knack recently for playing chilling and unsettling villains.  I figured it was worth giving it another go around, and I’m happy to report “The Wrath of Becky” is lightyears better than the first film.

When the film introduces us to Becky a few years later, she has an edge to her after the traumatic events of the previous film.  She’s sarcastic, matter-of-fact, and she doesn’t suffer fools lightly.  She has been bounced around from group home to group home. Eventually, she decides to rent out a room with an older African-American woman who takes in strangers and is dealing with her own sense of loss. Her name is Elena, played by Denise Burse. One night while waitressing, Becky runs into a group of men who call themselves the Noble Men.  They are a white supremacist militia group with bad intentions.  After she spills coffee on one of them, they follow her back to Elena’s house, where they proceed to kill Elena and take Becky’s dog Diego.

Now, Becky is looking for two things: revenge and to get her dog back. The film uses an interesting technique where it will show the audience a violent sequence of what she is hoping to do, and then what she actually does. They use voiceovers for this as well, which was a nice touch.  She communicates with the audience and lets us know what she’s thinking.  They don’t overdo this, thankfully.  The Noble Men are brought back to the house of one of their leaders named Darryl, played brilliantly by Seann William Scott.  Scott and Wilson are the stars here, and Scott knows how to be unnerving and very intense without trying too hard. I remember him in a film called “Bloodline,” and he crushed it in that film.  He’s really, really good at playing these low-key, calm, and sadistic villains.

The rest of the group consists of DJ (Aaron Dalla Villa), Anthony (Michael Sirow), and Sean (Matt Angel). Twig (Courtney Gains) is already with Darryl at the house.  They have members all over the world, and they are looking to take down Senator Hernandez (Gabriella Piazza) at an upcoming town hall event.  First, they have to deal with extreme girl scout Becky, and she is not one to back down from a fight, especially since they have her dog and they killed the one living person in the world she actually liked.  From here, it’s a rather straight-forward film with Becky taking on these misogynist, hateful, and narrow-minded men.  The characters are a little too on the nose at times, politically, but it works as a film like “The Wrath of Becky” is one where you are going to sit back and watch Becky destroy bad people in creative and brutal ways.

The film is not shy about its violence.  It really goes for it.  As with any sequel, especially one which relies on violence, they really up the ante here.  They were also smart enough to keep the film under 90 minutes.  We are reintroduced to Becky, find out what she’s up to, meet the villains, and then it’s time for the mayhem.  It’s a formula, yes, but it’s a formula that works because Wilson is terrific at playing Becky.  She’s a badass chick and easy to root for as the heroine.  She also has a worthy adversary in Seann William Scott. The scenes with the two of them together are just brilliant.

In the end, you know what you are getting with “The Wrath of Becky” and what you have signed up for as an audience member.  I could have done without the dog being involved, not because it offended me, but because it seemed to take a page out of other films, most recently “John Wick.”  We have seen people try to avenge their dog when it has been captured or killed. The ending seems to hint that there might be another film or two still left in the “Becky” franchise. If they keep the budget low and stick to one location, which is basically what they did here, I see no reason why they can’t continue to make more of these films. Wilson is a star, and she deserves her own franchise. I look forward to seeing her take on more villains portrayed by quality actors in the future.

Should You See It?

The film is being released on May 26.  I know there are a lot of movies to choose from at the box office right now.  “The Wrath of Becky” is a nice change of pace, though, from the usual fare of blockbusters and franchises.  It’s bloody, gory and very, very entertaining.  As stated in my review, this film knows what it needs to do, it stays out of the way of its actors, and it’s a ton of fun. I truly enjoyed seeing Lulu Wilson and Seann William Scott in a battle of wits.  It’s way better than 2020’s “Becky,” as it moves at a faster pace, gets right to the meat of the matter, and it doesn’t hold back with its violent, in-your-face approach.  I think it would be a lot of fun to watch on the big screen.  It’s in limited release, but you can find it at a theater near you.  I don’t think you will be disappointed if you enjoy blood, guts and have a sense of humor.

* * * out of * * * *