With James Gunn’s long-awaited “Superman” now arriving in theaters everywhere, I am eager to find out if this iteration of the Man of Steel will have any opening credits. And if it does, what will the music to them sound like? The score for the 2025 film is credited to John Murphy and David Fleming, and they both have quite a legacy to live up to which makes the challenge given to them all the more daunting.
Look, it is still impossible to top Richard Donner’s “Superman: The Movie” which brought this symbol of hope to an iconic high, but it will be even harder to top that classic’s opening credits which remain some of the best ever created. Being hurtled to the edges of outer space as the titles stretched out towards the audience was ever so thrilling to me as a youngster, and it has been said that they cost more money to make than most movies back in the day.
And yes, all the visuals were elevated by the opening theme composed by John Williams, a man who has composed so many iconic musical cues and probably still has a couple more left in him. It remains one of my favorite movie themes of all time, let alone one of favorites of Williams’. All of this comes together to create an exhilarating opening to what has long become one of the greatest superhero movies ever made. While this opening could have been “Superman: The Movie’s” peak, something which can result in what I call premature cinematic ejaculation, it instead sets you up and makes clear you are about to watch one of the most entertaining motion pictures you could ever hope to see.
These titles were created by Richard Greenberg of R/Greenberg and Associates (R/GA), and they proved to be his breakthrough into show business. I have included a link for an interview with Greenberg from the Art of the Title website down below in which he describes this opening’s creation, and it can tell you much more than I can in this article.
And, of course, please feel free to watch the high-definition edition of the “Superman: The Movie” opening titles down below.
The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.
Hollywood has long been a fan of buddy cop movies, as people love to see big action, memorable villains and witty repartee between the polar opposite main characters. “Lethal Weapon” is a film I’ve heard about ever since I started watching movies, especially the famous line, “I’m too old for this shit,” delivered perfectly by Danny Glover. Now, thanks to the 4K release of this film from Warner Brothers, I’ve finally had a chance to sit down and watch it in its entirety. It is certainly one of the better buddy cop movies to have ever been released in Hollywood, thanks to the tremendous on-screen chemistry shared between Mel Gibson and Danny Glover. They make it look effortless. I’m happy to report I’m not too old to sit down and watch “Lethal Weapon” for the first time.
The film opens with a naked young woman snorting a line of cocaine and jumping off her balcony to her impending death. This occurs on the day of Roger Murtaugh’s (Danny Glover) 50th birthday, as we see him trying to navigate through his happy yet chaotic homelife. He’s been assigned a new partner, Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson), an unhinged and wildly unpredictable cop who has unconventional methods, but you can’t argue with his success. It’s been 11 years since the death of his wife, and he struggles every day with thoughts of suicide. Indeed, it’s easy to see why Murtaugh feels like he is too old for this shit, as the two of them are as opposite as fire and ice.
Murtaugh and Riggs must put their heads together and find out the real reason why this young woman, Amanda Hunsaker (Jackie Swanson) committed suicide. Murtaugh gets a call from an old war buddy Michael (Tom Atkins), Amanda’s father, and Michael reminds Murtaugh that he saved his life when they were in battle. There are definitely some nefarious individuals behind this, and Riggs sees the complexity of these cases and isn’t afraid to dig deeper or get his hands dirty. Murtaugh, on the other hand, looks for the simplest and easiest solution to these cases. He has too much at stake because he’s married and has children at home. Riggs, on the other hand, has nothing to lose and doesn’t care if he dies, so he will do what needs to be done, consequences be damned.
“Lethal Weapon” was directed by the legendary Richard Donner (“Superman,” “The Goonies,” and “The Omen”), and was written by Shane Black (“The Nice Guys” and “The Monster Squad”). They collaborated with Gibson and Glover to create a memorable piece of cinema. I do think the first hour of the film is absolutely perfect as it moves quickly, introduces the main characters and the villains, including a memorable performance by Gary Busey, and it’s a lot of fun. It’s clear they are comfortable taking their time in allowing these characters to grow on screen, as we get to know them, inside and out. Because of this, the stakes matter that much more when the shit hits the fan. The comedy is also effortless and never forced.
I did feel like the second half hit a bit of a lull when the good guys met up with the bad guys. Of course, it was the 1980’s, so there needed to be big action (in addition to big hair and big outfits) and special effects, but they could have done probably half of what they did and it would have been even more effective. There is also a wild karate battle between Busey and Gibson, which made me laugh but for all the wrong reasons. It seemed odd to go in that direction at the very end. The film starts out by letting the audience know it’s going to be a different type of action comedy, and I enjoyed the balance of seriousness and comedy. I was hoping the film would have kept that tone a little bit more in the second half, but it turns into a bit of a silly action movie. Still, “Lethal Weapon” has a good script, a top-notch cast, and skilled direction. It’s a good movie, but I don’t think it’s a great movie because of the issues I’ve mentioned.
It should be noted that I watched the director’s cut of “Lethal Weapon,” so I’m not sure how much of a difference there is between it and the theatrical cut, as this was my first time watching the film. The director’s cut is 117 minutes, and the theatrical cut is 110 minutes. I’d be curious to hear from those who have seen both cuts as to how much of a difference there is between them. I think the film should have been around 100 minutes, and it would have been just about perfect. I can’t speak for the sequels, but I can see why audiences wanted to see more of these two, as they had some of the best onscreen chemistry I’ve seen in a buddy cop comedy. Glover is smart, tough, and vulnerable while Gibson is crazed and determined, but there’s also a method to his madness. I loved these two characters.
* * * out of * * * *
4K Info: “Lethal Weapon” is released on a single-disc 4K from Warner Brothers Home Entertainment in either a 4K slipcover or a 4K steelbook. As mentioned in my review, the 4K comes with both the theatrical cut and the director’s cut. The film is rated R for strong violence, strong language, brief drug use, and some nudity. There is also a digital copy included.
4K Video/Audio Info: The film was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Sound, and wow, this is quite a Dolby Atmos soundtrack. The film is LOUD, and I do mean LOUD. At times, I found it to be a little too loud, which must mean I’m too old, but in all seriousness, if you enjoy your action flicks loud and in-your-face, you won’t be disappointed with the audio here. I did enjoy the 1980’s saxophone that was present throughout the movie. It’s a jaunty soundtrack that stayed in my head. As far as the video here, the HDR is splendid on this release, and it makes the film look sharp, vivid, and lively without losing its 80’s aesthetic. Hey, I was born in the 80’s, and I appreciate that decade very much, especially the music that was released then!
Special Features:
· A Legacy of Inspiration: Remembering Richard Donner
· “I’m Too Old for This…”
Should You Buy It?
Yes! Personally speaking, I’m a big fan of a crisp 4K slipcover, and the slipcover release of Lethal Weapon is a thing of beauty. I really enjoyed the home theater experience of watching this movie, as it left me drained in the best possible way. The film presents a multitude of elements to the viewer, and while not all of them resonated with me, they were more effective than not. The film is memorable and stands out because of the performances of Mel Gibson and Danny Glover. In some ways, they look at one another and they see what they are missing in themselves. Murtaugh sees Riggs as someone who is not afraid to think outside the box, take risks, and find his man. Riggs sees Murtaugh as having the family life he wishes he could have had if his wife hadn’t died. The film is, at times, heartfelt, without trying too hard or being sugary sweet. Gary Busey is a kick-ass bad guy because he’s as cold as ice and doesn’t flinch. I wish the film was about 10-15 minutes shorter, depending on the release you watch, but it’s still a good flick. Warner Brothers also includes two new special features on this release, and they are one of the only studios that is releasing classic Hollywood films with new special features. I think physical media collectors will be VERY happy with the 4K release of “Lethal Weapon.”
**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free. The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.
The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.
“A Minecraft Movie” is the highest grossing film of 2025 so far, and it’s easy to see why. It’s based on a popular video game, so it has a built-in audience with teens, and even young adults who grew up playing the game. It’s a family-friendly movie which is inoffensive, harmless and silly. For someone like myself, who is nearing his 40th birthday, I understand I’m not the key demographic. I never played the video game, and I’m not at all familiar with the source material. The jokes are also not my cup of tea, as they seem to be aimed at a younger demographic who find things such as “Chicken Jockey” hilarious. This became mainstream news when teenagers would lose their minds throwing popcorn in the air and making a mess in local theaters. This was another reminder of why I prefer to watch my movies from the comfort of my couch.
“A Minecraft Movie” was directed by Jared Hess of “Napoleon Dynamite” fame, and his sense of humor is on full-display here. The humor is juvenile, goofy and over-the-top. Jack Black stars as Steve, a doorknob salesman (is that a thing?), who is looking to make up for lost time by breaking into a mine. When he was younger, kids were forbidden from doing this sort of thing. While in the mine, he discovers the Orb of Dominance and the Earth Crystal. When they are put together, a portal is created to the Overworld where cubes can be molded to your desire, and Steve creates three houses for himself in the process.
We are also introduced to a World Champion Video gamer from 1989 by the name of Garrett “The Garbage Man” Garrison, played by Jason Momoa. He looks like professional wrestler Randy “Macho Man” Savage, and he’s struggling to stay relevant with his video game store, which is about to go out of business. In an effort to keep his business afloat, he tries to win the contents of a storage unit which he believes houses Atari Cosmos. Instead, he gets his hands on the Orb and the Crystal, which once belonged to a young Steve. Garrettt doesn’t know what he has his hands on, but he’s in for quite a rude awakening.
During all of this, Garrett befriends a young boy named Henry (Sebastian Eugene Hansen) who has moved to Chuglass, Idaho with his sister Natalie (Emma Myers) after their mother passed away. Henry is looking to fit in at school, and Natalie is looking to keep a roof over their heads. Little do they know that they are about to enter a world which is beyond their wildest dreams when they are sucked into a portal and enter the Overworld. They must team up with Steve in order to fight off Malgosha, a piglin ruler of an evil world known as the Nether. Henry is very creative and full of ideas which he will need to use in order to help them fight off various creatures and obstacles along the way.
Even though my rating of this film will be harsh (ONE STAR), my overall review is not that harsh because this film isn’t poorly made or a waste of time. Instead, it’s just not for someone like me. The audience for this movie is young boys who are looking to laugh, have a good time and be entertained without thinking too much. They are also familiar with all the jokes, characters and the world in which those characters inhabit. For me, I understood what was going on and the rules of the world, but I didn’t connect with it as I simply didn’t care about what was happening on screen from a story perspective. I found Jack Black to be loud throughout, and I found it very grating and tiring after a while as this was Jack Black on steroids and screaming throughout. Momoa was an aloof goofball who was in love with himself, and he does provide a few laughs.
I liked the brother/sister relationship and how close they were after the passing of their mother, and I wish the film would have given this storyline a little more time on screen. Jennifer Coolidge also appears as the vice principal, and she does her best, but the material doesn’t do her any favors. Even with Jason Momoa, he seemed to know the assignment, and he was game, but before long, everything and everyone got lost in the world of Minecraft. I know that is what the audience is paying for, and they give them plenty of goofiness, silliness, and wild action. If that is what you are looking for, I imagine “A Minecraft Movie” will be right up your alley. If you are looking for a little more to the story and to the film, you won’t find it here.
* out of * * * *
4K Info:A Minecraft Movie is released on a single-disc 4K from Warner Brothers Home Entertainment. The film has a running time of 101 minutes and is rated PG for violence/action, language, suggestive/rude humor and some scary images. It also comes with a digital copy that can be redeemed online.
4K Video/Audio Info: This is, so far, the best-looking 4K of the year. Wow. The colors are bright and full of life. This is a terrific transfer that features eye-popping visuals. The Dolby Vision transfer gets an A+. The Dolby Atmos soundtrack also gets an A+, as this film is a true theatrical experience in the comfort of your own home. Subtitles are included in English, Spanish, and French.
Special Features:
Building the World of Minecraft: Block Party – featurette (14:19)
Creepers, Zombies, and Endermen Oh My! – featurette (13:14)
A Minecraft Movie: Block Beats – featurette (9:01)
A Minecraft Movie: Pixel Pals – featurette (14:02)
Marlene + Nitwit – featurette (5:07)
Should You Buy It?
If you enjoyed this movie in theaters, and plenty of people did, you couldn’t ask for a better home video release than Warner Brothers has put together for “A Minecraft Movie” on 4K. I couldn’t believe how amazing it looked and sounded in 4K. Even though what was happening on screen wasn’t connecting with me, I couldn’t take my eyes off the screen, as it was so colorful. There are also some interesting special features included on this 4K release. Again, this falls under the category of “This was not my cup of tea.” However, I can acknowledge this was a labor of love and people enjoyed the film. Who am I to be the Grinch and ruin their good day? I’m just here to tell you that this film is only for Minecraft fans and for families. For everyone else, there is little to like here and a lot that will annoy, especially Jack Black’s boisterous performance.
**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free. The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.
Michael Patrick Jann is best known for his work in comedy and as a cast member on MTV’s sketch comedy show “The State.” In 1999, he made his feature film directorial debut with “Drop Dead Gorgeous” which over the years has developed quite the cult following. With his second feature film as a director, “Organ Trail,” he got out of his comedy safety zone to enter the horror genre. Michael now returns to that genre again with his latest film, “Alma & The Wolf,” which stars Ethan Embry as a troubled police officer who investigates a mysterious wolf attack which happened to a high school classmate of his, Alma (played by Li Jun Li). The investigation becomes even more intense, however, when his son goes missing, and it puts him a collision course with an unbearable truth that can only stay hidden for so long.
I got to speak with Michael one-on-one recently about “Alma & The Wolf,” and we talked a lot about how comedy and horror deal with the various forms of suffering. Also, he discussed the challenges of filming on the Oregon Coast when the weather was really bad and cold, working with animals, and of working with his son, Lukas Jann, who plays Ethan Embry’s son here. In addition, this film also co-stars a classmate of mine from my University of California, Irvine school days, Beth Malone, who plays a rather nosy neighbor. It was great to talk with Michael about what Beth brought to her role and the movie, and it is always great to see her in anything and everything.
“Alma & The Wolf” is now available to rent and stream on select digital platforms. Please check out my interview with Michael down below, and I have also included a trailer for the film as well.
One of the many horror films coming to us in 2025 is arriving this week, and that’s “Alma & The Wolf.” Directed by Michael Patrick Jann, it stars Ethan Embry as Deputy Ren Accord, a very troubled man who has been thrust into a horrifying investigation he may not be fully prepared for. One day while driving on his usual route, he comes across Alma, played by Li Jun Li, who is walking alone in the rain while clutching to what is left of her dog. Alma tells Ren a wolf killed her dog and begs him to kill the wolf for her as an act of revenge. Wolves, however, are protected wildlife in the state of Oregon, so Ren tells Alma he cannot help her that way. But when his son goes missing in the Oregon coast, Ren comes to believe it may have everything to do with the wolf that killed Alma’s dog, and he becomes infinitely determined to find his son and kill the elusive wolf.
I was lucky enough to speak with Ethan Embry and Li Jun Li who are the main stars of “Alma & The Wolf” this past week. Ethan started off his career as a child actor, and he starred opposite Ed O’Neil in the John Hughes written and produced film “Dutch,” and he is best known for his roles in “A Far Off Place,” “Empire Records” and “That Thing You Do.” Li got her start as an actress in the theatre, and she later became known for her role as Iris Chang in the television series “Quantico.” In addition, she has received critical acclaim for her roles as Lady Fay Zhu in Damien Chazelle’s “Babylon” and Grace Chow in Ryan Coogler’s “Sinners.”
Much of my talk with Ethan and Li Li, as she likes to be called, was about acting and their choices. With “Alma & The Wolf,” they were involved in a cinematic production which had a very short production schedule, and I was curious how the speed of it affected their performances overall. Being an actor myself, I found their answers to be deeply informative and fascinating.
“Alma & The Wolf” will be dropped on streaming services starting on June 20, 2025. Please check out the interview below, and I have included a trailer for the film as well.
The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.
At 57-years-old, Jason Statham has made quite a career out of playing the Jason Statham character. Some might say, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” However, I think it’s reached the point where it’s starting to become quite tedious and laborious to see him simply spinning his wheels with his film choices. Do his characters even need names or backstories? You can just call them, ‘The Jason Statham character’. His latest film, “A Working Man,” was directed by David Ayer, who collaborated with him on 2024’s “The Beekeeper.” While “The Beekeeper” was good fun, there isn’t a whole lot of entertainment value in “A Working Man.”
Statham stars as Levon Cade, a man with a background in the Royal Marines. After the death of his wife, he’s now working in construction for the Garcia family in Chicago. He is looking to keep a low profile, keep his head above water, and also spend some time with his daughter. She’s currently staying with his father-in-law who is not a fan of Levon. As a matter of fact, he blames Levon for the death of his daughter, as she passed away while he was in combat. He’s trying to get more time with his daughter, but his father-in-law is not only extremely rich, but he’s fueled by anger and bitterness. He looks at Levon as someone who can’t control his anger and thinks violence is the only answer.
Arianna Rivas, Michael Peña and Jason Statham star in the film “A Working Man.” (OSV News photo/courtesy Dan Smith, Amazon MGM Studios)
One night, Jenny Garcia (Arianna Rivas), the only daughter of Joe and Carla (Michael Peña and Noemí González) goes missing when she goes out to celebrate an academic achievement. They suspect foul play is involved, so they look to Levon Cade for help, as they get a feeling that he has a background that might lend itself to helping them out. At first, Levon is hesitant to get himself involved in anything, as he says he’s a different person now. He decides to help them out because he’s having a battle for visitation rights over his daughter and he’s fiercely loyal to the Garcia’s who have helped and been patient with him during a difficult time in his life.
From this point forward, you have a paint-by-numbers revenge flick where Statham is bound and determined to find the men and women responsible for Jenny’s disappearance. On paper, this might sound like a fun flick to sit back and relax while you shut off your brain. This would be true if we hadn’t seen this countless times over with Statham. Let me put it this way—Pizza is great, but if you start to have pizza every night of the week, it starts to make you feel sick. The bad guys in the film are these cheesy, over-the-top Russians who are laughable and can’t be taken seriously. You know what’s going to happen, but it takes almost two hours to reach our destination. I was long checked out of this film mentally by the time it was nearing its conclusion.
I’m a fan of movies that are so bad, they’re good, but make no mistake about it, “A Working Man” is just bad. This film is all about the action sequences, the kills, and the explosions. I can’t sit through another Jason Statham film unless he plays against type, which I don’t see happening anytime soon. I’d be happy to be proven wrong, but “A Working Man” is only for diehard Statham fans who want to seek out his entire filmography. For everyone else, like me, who is feeling extreme fatigue from another Statham film with no imagination, bland kills and a lazy plot, you’ll be wise to skip this one.
* out of * * * *
4K Info:A Working Man is being released on a single-disc 4K from Warner Brothers Home Entertainment. It has a running time of 116 minutes and is rated R for strong violence, language throughout and drug content. It also comes with a digital copy of the film.
4K Video Info: The 4K HDR transfer is incredible. The picture is clear, vivid, and full of color and life. Even though the film isn’t much to watch from an entertainment perspective, it looks stunning in 4K.
4K Audio Info: The Dolby Atmos track really pops on this release as well, as it brings the film to life in your home theater.
Special Features:
NONE
Should You Buy It?
“A Working Man” is an A+ movie when it comes to the audio and visual aspects of this 4K release. It looks mesmerizing, and it also sounds terrific. Sadly, it’s a D movie. Moving forward, unless Jason Statham makes a real effort to think outside the box with his film choices, I’m going to politely decline his future projects. I went into this movie with low expectations, as I thought it would be harmless fun, but instead, it’s just a dull, lifeless, and listless movie. Even though I enjoy the style of director David Ayer, this screenplay, which was co-written by Sylvester Stallone, is dead on arrival. The characters here are so vanilla and one-note. The writing is absolutely terrible. I don’t know if these were real Russians in the film or not, but they came across as fake and phony villains. They spend about 15 minutes setting up this plot and the rest is all in the chase, but I didn’t care about the chase because I barely had time to get to know these characters. I know you might be tempted to seek this film out, as a late-night quality pleasure, but make no mistake about it: This film is only for fanatical Statham fans.
**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free. The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.
The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.
“The Alto Knights” is a film that, on paper, should have been a big hit. It was directed by the legendary Barry Levinson who has directed such films as “Diner,” “The Natural,” “Rain Man” and “Bugsy.” It also stars the iconic Academy Award winner Robert De Niro, and even though not all of his films are worthwhile, it’s rare you see him give an uninteresting or bland performance. The writer was Nicholas Pileggi, who wrote “Goodfellas’ and “Casino” alongside Martin Scorsese. The producer was Irwin Winkler, whose credits are too lengthy to list. With all the talent involved in this project, you would think they would have at least made an above average flick.
“The Alto Knights” features two performances by De Niro as he plays two separate gangsters in the 1950’s, Vito Genovese and Frank Costello. My first issue with the film is why on earth did we need to have competing gangsters played by De Niro? While it might sound like an interesting concept, having De Niro play two roles in the same film, it’s quickly obvious this is a gimmick that just doesn’t work. It has been done in other films before, such as “Mickey 17,” “Sinners” and “The Social Network,” but De Niro looks ridiculous and laughably bad with all the makeup on him.
When the film opens, Frank is recovering from a failed assassination attempt put on him by his best friend, Vito. They have been friends since they were young, but they have two very different philosophies when it comes to being gangsters. Frank is someone who doesn’t like to rock the boat, and he’s not afraid to grease some palms to keep out of trouble. He cherishes his marriage to his wife Bobbie, played by Debra Messing. Vito, on the other hand, lives by the credo of, “I take out. I don’t put in.”
Vito doesn’t believe Frank is actually going to live a quiet life and retire as he sees him as a politician, someone who will smile to your face and stab you in the back when you aren’t looking. Frank, on the other hand, sees Vito as someone who will stop at nothing to get what he wants, and he will not go down without a fight. This leads to a war between the two men where only one can survive, and it’s about who will flinch first. One thing is clear—no matter who wins, the audience will end up being the real loser.
“The Alto Knights” is a film which made me feel sad at how bad it was, as there is no way it should have been this unwatchable and boring. All of the proceedings have a been there, done that feel to them. Films about the mob, gangsters and the crime life have been done to death, and I don’t think there is anything new to add to the genre at this point. This is not to say they can’t come back at a later date and time with the right material, but this film feels dead on arrival as it feels like a parody of other gangster movies. This is a film that was not only a massive commercial failure, but it was a critical failure as well.
When you have seen De Niro play this role before, it’s hard not to look at this performance and think to yourself, “Why?” Why did anyone think this was a good idea? The poster for the film says, “From the hitmakers of ‘Goodfellas,’ ‘The Irishman’ and ‘Bugsy.’” I’m going to assume they thought people would hear about De Niro in a new gangster movie from the writer of “Goodfellas” and would be interested in seeing it as a result. It’s clear from the box office numbers they could not have been more wrong. As a matter of fact, I don’t even remember this film getting any attention or advertising when it was released only two months ago.
One of my least favorite things to do as a moviegoer is to watch the clock during a movie. During “The Alto Knights,” I couldn’t stop looking at the clock and waiting for it to end. As stated earlier, the film made me depressed as it felt like De Niro and Levinson were was wasting his time on rotten garbage like this. They are both in their 80’s, and we don’t know how many films they have left in them. I’m sad they wasted their talents on this project, and I’m sad I wasted my time watching it.
* out of * * * *
Special Features:
One Legend, Two Mobsters – Featurette
Blu Ray Audio/Video Info: The 1080p high-definition transfer is perfect for this film, and it features a clear and vivid image. The Dolby Atmos track also brings all of the classic hits of the 1950’s into your living room.
Should You Buy It?
“The Alto Knights” is not a film you should waste your time on, unless you are absolutely obsessed with gangster movies and need to watch them all. If you have a morbid curiosity in this film, I’m here to tell you to not waste your time. I went into it knowing it didn’t have great reviews, but I said to myself, ‘How bad could it be?’ Trust me, it’s that bad. It’s painful to watch De Niro in this film, and I just wanted it to end. It didn’t take long for me to realize I was stuck in a bad movie, and I just had to bide my time until it was over. There are better gangster movies to see, and there is even a better gangster show to watch in “The Sopranos.” This is one of the biggest disappointments to come out of Hollywood in the past five years, and it is a hard pass.
**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free. The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.
There is always a wealth of original content being dropped on Netflix from one month to the next, and one of the latest additions to its streaming service is a miniseries called “The Residence” which I watched all the way through in just one day. A murder comedy mystery created by Paul Williams Davies, based on Kate Andersen Brower’s novel “The Residence: Inside the Private World of the White House” and produced by Shondaland, the amazing television empire overseen by Shonda Rhimes, it tells the tale of the White House Chief Usher, A.B. Winter (Giancarlo Esposito), who ius found murdered in one of America’s most secured locations, the White House. Into the crime scene comes Cordelia Cupp (Uzo Aduba), a consultant with the Metropolitan Police Department and an avid birdwatcher, who is determined to find the culprit responsible. The problem is, there dozens upon dozens of suspects to consider, be it those with quite the public presence or the staff who works behind the scenes. Suffice to say, it proves to be one very long night for everyone involved.
Among those suspects is engineer Bruce Geller, an engineer who succeeds in getting the water pressure in the United States President’s shower just right after far too many tries. Bruce is played by Mel Rodriguez, a native of the Little Havana neighborhood in Miami, Florida, and a graduate of SUNY Purchase (State University of New York Purchase) which has produced unforgettable actors like him, Melissa Leo, Edie Falco, Wesley Snipes, and Ving Rhames among so many others. Mel’s most memorable appearances include playing Nurse Patsy de la Serda on the HBO comedy “Getting On,” Ernie Gomes on the Showtime drama “On Becoming a God in Central Florida,” Marco Pasternak on “Better Call Saul,” and Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Hugo Ramirez on “CSI: Vegas.” Suffice to say, he is a character actor who continues to find work in an industry which is notoriously hard to break into, and more power to him.
I was lucky enough to interview Mel about his role of Bruce Geller in “The Residence,” and it was a lot of fun talking to him about this Netflix miniseries and about other things. Those things included what he learned as a student at SUNY Purchase, why the scripts for this show were among the best he had ever read, and his memories of the late Andre Braugher who was originally cast as A.B. Winter before he unexpectedly passed away.
“The Residence” is now streaming on Netflix, and it is highly recommended by The Ultimate Rabbit as it is highly entertaining and wonderfully intricate. Please check out our interview with Mel Rodriguez down below.
The following review was written by Ultimate Rabbit correspondent, Tony Farinella.
Studio movies seem to be falling into two categories these days—they are either inspired by other movies or they are looking to do something unique and different. “Mickey 17” falls into the latter category. Even though it is based on the novel “Mickey7” by Edward Ashton, it is a rather unique and “out there” movie. It is a science fiction comedy with big ideas, over-the-top characters and representations. I can’t compare it to any other movie out there, which is becoming increasingly rare in today’s cinema. So often, when you watch a movie, it reminds you of one or two others that have already been released. Franchises, sequels and reboots are also becoming far too common. Original ideas, even if based off books, are infrequent visitors in the cinematic landscape of today.
“Mickey 17” is directed by the Academy Award-winning director of “Parasite,” Bong Joon Ho, and it follows the story of Mickey Barnes, played by Robert Pattinson of “Twilight” fame. After Mickey and his buddy Timo (Steven Yeun) fall into debt because their macaron business falls apart, they are out of options. This leads them to joining a spaceship crew where they hope to blend in and avoid getting murdered by flying under the radar. While Timo becomes a shuttle pilot, Mickey decides to become an “expendable,” which is a job where he is in charge of dying over and over again in order to find answers for various problems in society.
Mickey Barnes is sheepish, dopey, and painfully shy. However, he enjoys his new lease on life because of his relationship with an agent named Nasha, played by Naomi Ackie. They are madly in love with each other, and she helps Mickey deal with the fact that dying is not a whole lot of fun. Even though he is brought back to life because of a process called “reprinting,” it doesn’t make dying any easier for Mickey as he is, in many ways, a human guinea pig. With his work, they are able to come up with vaccines that will save lives.
One day, his life is turned upside down when his life is spared by a group of critters known as Creepers. This leads to him being turned into a double, so while he is Mickey 17, there is also a Mickey 18, a version of him that is confident, self-assured and fearless. Nasha doesn’t mind having two Mickey’s, as it is more fun for her to fool around with two versions of her boyfriend. On this expedition, there is a leader named Kenneth Marshall, played by Mark Ruffalo, and it’s hard not to draw comparisons to Donald Trump with his performance. I had to look this up after watching the movie, and I’m not the only one who felt this way, even though Bong Joon Ho and Ruffalo say that was not their intention. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. Kenneth’s wife is played by Toni Collette.
“Mickey 17” is a film high on ambition and ideas, but it doesn’t have a sense of direction, and its pacing is all over the map. One of the most frustrating aspects of this movie is the fact it has a lot to say and there is a lot going on, but it falls apart because there is no sense of where they want to go with all of this. Is it a love story? Is it a commentary on there being two versions of yourself? Is it a commentary on self-sacrifice? Is it about abuse of power? It’s all of those things and a whole lot more, but without a clear and concise vision, not all of these ideas have the time to be fleshed out, even though the film is two hours and seventeen minutes long. The film is wildly uneven and frustrating.
Another big issue with the film is Pattinson and his bland and uninteresting performance. He’s not a good actor, even when he is given good material. I understand he’s trying to be taken seriously as an actor, but he doesn’t have the chops to carry the comedic scenes, and he also struggles with the more serious material as well. This is another problem with the film—it’s in search of a tone. Since it’s trying to do so much at once, it doesn’t know how to balance its themes or tones. It’s also way too long, and it needed a good trip to the editing room.
* * out of * * * *
4K Info: “Mickey 17” is released on a single-disc 4K from Warner Brothers Home Entertainment. The film has a running time of 137 minutes and is rated R for violent content, language throughout, sexual content and drug material. It also comes with a digital copy that can be redeemed on most digital platforms.
4K Video/Audio: “Mickey 17” gets the Dolby Vision/Atmos treatment, and it’s a remarkable release. The color palette really pops on this 4K release, and the Dolby Atmos audio track is also perfect for your home theater setup.
Special Features:
Behind the Lens: Bong Joon Ho’s Mickey 17 (11:32)
Mickey 17: A World Reimagined (9:44)
The Faces of Niflheim (8:00)
Should You Buy It?
“Mickey 17” is a film that might end up gaining a cult following in years to come, but it also might be a film that falls flat with a lot of audiences. I do think it is worth checking out because it is entertaining at times and has individual moments which stand out in a positive way. It’s just too inconsistent for its own good, and it needed better performances from its cast. I absolutely hated the Mark Ruffalo character, but it probably wasn’t in the way they intended for me to hate the character. After spending a little bit of time with him, I wanted him off my TV, and I would audibly groan when he would reappear. The film does have some good special features and from an audio and visual aspect, it looks and sounds great. The movie is just a jumbled mess, but it’s rarely, if ever, boring. I’d recommend you watch this one first before you decide to add it to your collection.
**Disclaimer** I received a copy of this film from Warner Brothers to review for free. The opinions and statements in the review are mine and mine alone.
So, I finally got to see Sean Baker’s “Anora,” the Palme d’Or and Best Picture winner, and I was fortunate enough to watch it at New Beverly Cinema in 35mm. It certainly has the look of a 1970’s cinematic classic even as it seems to be a familiar story of a woman who looks to be rescued from what many might consider a sordid existence. But when all is said and done, I could not take my eyes off the screen for a single second. Seriously, I always consider this to be quite the compliment.
We are introduced to Anora “Ani” Mikheeva (Mikey Madison), a 23-year-old stripper from Brighton Beach, New York during a montage which shows a line of sex workers giving customers lap dances. Her face sticks out immediately to where we are seeing an individual instead of just another worker, and things kick into high gear from there. We see Anora moving through the strip club like a real pro as she ingratiates herself to each and every customer with a strong likability, and she effortlessly encourages patrons to come with her to the nearby ATM to get some cash for a private VIP dance. She’s so convincing to where I have no doubt that the men are quick to forget the pesky ATM fee they pay when withdrawing their funds. What is now anyway, four dollars?
Then one night, Anora meets Ivan Zakharov (Mark Eydelshteyn), the son of a Russian oligarch whom she affectionally calls Vanya. They quickly find themselves spending a lot of time with one another as they travel out with friends to Las Vegas where they indulge in an endless party atmosphere, they are clearly not the least bit enthusiastic to see end. It’s an exhilarating sequence as it felt like we the audience was being drawn into the fun, and it culminates in Vanya proposing marriage to Anora, and it feels like things have nowhere else to go for them but up from there.
I initially found myself appreciating “Anora” as a comedy because my experiencing the infectious party atmosphere led to many hilarious moments, but I also felt a certain dread as I kept thinking the roof was going to fall down at some point. And when Ivan’s parents become aware of his recent marriage, and they send men over to his luxurious mansion (it has an elevator) to get Ivan’s act together and to have the marriage annulled.
It’s hard not to think of “Pretty Woman” while watching “Anora” as it has a similar plotline of a man welcoming a woman into a life of luxury which she has never seen up close before, but this is no Disney movie. As much as Anora is experiencing the highs life and privilege have to offer, I constantly sensed she was on the verge of experiencing some serious lows to where I felt a strong need to protect myself from the heartache I was convinced would eventually be heaped upon us all.
For the record, the only other Sean Baker film I have see to date is “Tangerine,” but like that one, “Anora” is filled with such wonderfully drawn characters who, in any other film, would have come across as caricatures in a lazily written screenplay. Just when I thought these characters would be ever so easy to figure out, they came to surprise me in wonderfully unexpected ways to where it is impossible for any of them to become one-dimensional. It also helps to have actors like Yura Borisov, Karren Karagulian, Vache Tovmasyan and Aleksei Serebryakov among so many others bring these characters to such vivid life.
But make no mistake, this is far and away Mikey Madison’s show. As much as I wanted Demi Moore to take home the Best Actress Oscar for “The Substance,” I can completely understand and appreciate why Madison took home the prize. She perfectly inhabits Anora as someone who is, above all else, a survivor. Throughout, Madison exhibits just about ever conceivable emotion Ani gets put through, and she also evokes a vulnerability that her innate toughness can never fully hide. Even if Ani is not always likable, you have to respect how she handles herself as she quickly reduces many around her to mere ashes.
Another performance worth singling out is Yura Borisov’s as Igor, a Russian henchman who, at first appearance, looks like he can beat the shit out of anyone dumb enough to cross his path. But Borisov shows there is more to him than meets the eye, particularly when he is quick to complement Ani after she punches him in the face. Even when he has no dialogue, the actor shows so much humanity for this particular henchman as he too has a vulnerability he cannot hide from those around him. And most importantly, Igor is the only one who dares to treat Ani as a person rather than a piece of meat as others are quick to label her as.
What I love most about “Anora” is how alive it feels. Baker and company have given us a motion picture which feels ever so lively to where nothing about it feels the least bit staged. Some will be quick to judge the title character for the line of the work she has chosen, but I found myself not willing to do so as this film left me completely enthralled throughout. It is a tremendous motion picture which takes the viewer on a journey they may not normally go on, It is no wonder to me why this film was so acclaimed as it invites your empathy to the characters in a very genuine way.
Whether or not I feel “Anora” deserved its Best Picture win at this year’s Academy Awards ceremony, I can quickly admit it deserves a place on my list of the ten best films of 2024. In a time where Hollywood is eager to continue long running franchises even if they have long overstayed their welcome, it is very reassuring to see a $6 million dollar defy the odds and make quite the impact in an immense cinematic landscape. While this film may not have the most original plot, it does take us through quite the emotional adventure, the kind which most audiences are not quick to appreciate in this day and age.
I am very eager to see this film again very soon, as experiencing the great tapestry of emotions made this cinematic experience all the more enthralling. Even though I know how things end in “Anora,” I still want to go through all those emotions again. Also, there is no forgetting Take That’s “Greatest Day” as reworked by Calum Scott and Robin Schulz.
The Ultimate Rabbit 